Biological Psychology

BACKGROUND: An individual's adaptation to threatening environments under uncertainty is reflected in stress responses. Predictability (the ability to anticipate events) and controllability (the ability to control outcomes) are central to how one adapts, yet their joint influence on aversive learning remains unclear. METHODS: Thirty healthy adults completed a probabilistic aversive learning task in which cue-outcome contingencies varied across levels of predictability and controllability, i.e. whether shock intensity depended on prediction accuracy. Prediction accuracy, reaction time, subjective stress ratings, and skin conductance responses were recorded throughout. Trial-wise learning dynamics were estimated using the Volatile Kalman Filter. RESULTS: Prediction accuracy reduced as environments became less predictable and negatively associated with higher learning rates across predictability levels, with the strongest relationship observed in highly predictable blocks. Skin conductance responses showed that moderately predictable environments elicited responses like those in highly predictable environments when accurate predictions reduced shock intensity, but resembled responses in unpredictable environments when shock intensity was uncontrollable. Model comparison revealed a double dissociation between subjective stress ratings and skin conductance responses. Subjective ratings were best explained by model-derived volatility when prediction accuracy determined shock intensity and by belief uncertainty when it was independent of prediction accuracy, whereas skin conductance responses showed the reverse pattern. Reaction times were best explained by belief uncertainty when predictions influenced shock intensity. Higher anxiety was associated with elevated learning rates in highly and moderately predictable blocks when predictions did not control shock intensity.

Creative performance fluctuates from moment to moment, suggesting that it depends partly on transient internal states present before creative thinking begins. Although such fluctuations have been identified in central neural activity, it remains unclear whether they are also reflected in autonomic physiology. We examined whether cardiac and electrodermal activity during a brief pre-trial resting period was associated with subsequent creative performance. Photoplethysmography, electrocardiography, and electrodermal activity were recorded while 28 participants completed the Alternative Uses Test and Fusion Innovation Test, assessing divergent and convergent creative thinking, respectively. Data from 27 participants was included in the analyses. Heart rate, heart rate variability, tonic skin conductance level, and phasic skin conductance activity were extracted from observation windows ranging from 11 to 30 s within a 30-s pre-trial rest period. Trial-level creativity was evaluated using GPT-based ratings of novelty, feasibility, and goal attainment. Linear mixed-effects models showed that higher pre-trial tonic skin conductance level was consistently associated with better subsequent creative performance across tasks, with overall model fit peaking at a 21-s observation window. Permutation-based feature-importance analysis provided convergent support for the contribution of tonic skin conductance, whereas the cardiac and phasic electrodermal indicators showed no reliable independent associations. However, the model explained only a small proportion of behavioral variance. These findings suggest that tonic sympathetic arousal reflects a momentary physiological state associated with creativity potential, while autonomic signals alone remain insufficient for accurate individual-level prediction.

Early life adversity is associated with increased risk for psychopathology and shifts in life history (LH) strategies, but the psychological mechanisms underlying these associations remain unclear. Drawing on evolutionary-developmental theory, we examined whether short-term mindsets mediate associations between dimensions of childhood adversity and mental health and LH-related outcomes. In a UK-representative sample of 877 adults, we assessed threat, deprivation, and unpredictability, alongside internalizing and externalizing symptoms, borderline features, and a latent factor capturing reproductive versus somatic maintenance effort. Structural equation models showed that adversity predicted poorer mental health and faster LH strategies. Short-term mindsets, indexed by lower future orientation and higher affective impulsivity, mediated effects of adversity, particularly unpredictability. Further decomposition of unpredictability into short-timescale and long-timescale forms revealed dissociable effects, with short-timescale unpredictability primarily linked to psychopathology and long-timescale unpredictability to reproductive-oriented LH strategies.

Cortisol, our stress hormone, exerts widespread influence on neural activity. However, its influence on the aperiodic component of the electroencephalography power spectrum remains to be investigated. Given individual differences in the capacity to cope with stress and adversity, it also remains unclear whether trait resilience moderates this relationship. Hence, the present study examined whether individual differences in trait resilience moderates the association between resting cortisol and aperiodic activity. Participants (N=145) completed various self-report questionnaires (e.g., trait resilience). Electroencephalography was recorded over a 20-minute baseline period, followed by salivary cortisol collection. The results revealed a significant moderating effect of trait resilience in the occipital scalp region. Specifically, higher cortisol concentration was associated with flatter 1/f slopes amongst individuals with low trait resilience, whereas this association was reversed amongst those with high trait resilience. Overall, our findings highlight the role of individual differences in trait resilience in shaping hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis-related neural dynamics.

Previous research suggests that women and men may differ in moral decision-making involving instrumental harm. However, prior findings have yielded inconsistent explanations for these differences, suggesting effects of gender expression, empathy, action tendencies, and biological causes, such as differences in gonadal hormone levels. Yet, no data exists on the effects of endogenous estradiol and progesterone on moral decision-making, while the effects of testosterone are inconsistent. Our study aimed to close this research gap. A sample of 137 cis individuals (73 women, 64 men) completed a moral dilemma task based on the Consequences, Norms, Inaction (CNI) model either in the morning or evening. Relevant personality traits, including agreement with instrumental harm, impartial beneficence, empathy, and gender expression, were assessed via self-report. Blood samples were analyzed for estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, and cortisol. Contrary to prior literature, no behavioral differences between women and men were observed in moral decision-making. However, self-reported agreement with instrumental harm positively predicted sensitivity to consequences and negatively predicted adherence to moral norms in the whole sample. Estradiol concentration positively predicted sensitivity to consequences in the morning women group, and general inaction tendency in the morning men group. Overall, these findings highlight the joint influence of biological and personality factors on moral choices and hint towards subtle sex/gender differences.

BackgroundHigh-frequency heart-rate variability (HF-HRV) is a downstream marker of cortico-autonomic regulation linked to executive function. A recent proposal suggests it indexes regulatory processes because it is both a product of and contributor to neural organization within the prefrontal cortex. The oscillatory phase of HF-HRV has been reported to modulate fronto-central EEG amplitude at rest, and this coupling is attenuated in individuals with schizophrenia relative to healthy controls. We evaluated this brain-body correspondence in relation to anxiety symptomatology, which is likewise associated with autonomic dysregulation. MethodsConcurrent EEG and electrocardiography (ECG) were recorded in 22 nonclinical adults at rest and during a mental arithmetic task. Participants rated anxiety severity using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7). We evaluated between-person associations between anxiety severity and HF-HRV-EEG coupling, as well as within-person differences in coupling between rest and mental arithmetic. ResultsAnxiety symptomatology was associated with decreased resting-state phase-amplitude coupling between HF-HRV phase and fronto-central theta amplitude, independent of EEG and HRV covariates. Relative to rest, HF-HRV-theta coupling increased during a cognitive task, independent of condition-related changes in EEG, HR, or respiration. Anxiety severity moderated the task-evoked changes in heart-brain coupling such that more anxious individuals exhibited larger condition-related differences. Simple-slope analyses indicated anxietys effect on coupling at rest was absent when engaged in a task. ConclusionsHF-HRV-theta phase-amplitude coupling captured anxiety-related and state-dependent variance not evident in conventional cardiac or neural indices. This coupling may index a state-sensitive component of cortico-autonomic regulation, although its putative functional role requires direct testing.

Spontaneous thought changes over time, yet the moment-to-moment factors shaping these changes remain poorly understood. We examined whether heartbeat-related bodily processing, operating largely outside explicit awareness, is associated with the organization of ongoing thought. Forty adults performed an auditory attention task with intermittent thought probes in which auditory events were scheduled either 200 ms after each detected R peak (synch condition) or independently of ongoing cardiac timing (asynch condition), with occasional omissions in both conditions. Heartbeat-synchronous omissions in this paradigm have been shown to induce cardiac deceleration and modulate heartbeat-evoked potentials (HEPs). The score of the heartbeat counting task (HCT) served as a behavioral index related to cardiac interoceptive accuracy. The results showed that higher HCT score was associated with a stronger synch-asynch shift toward more self-related and less task/self-unrelated thought. HEPs showed a synch-related negative shift across several thought groups, although the magnitude of this condition effect did not reliably differ among thought groups. Overall thought-group distributions were similar across conditions, while transition analyses suggested a tendency in the synch condition toward more frequent transitions linking predominantly interoceptive stimulus-dependent thought with both on-task and self-related thought. Together, these findings suggest that heartbeat-related bodily processing may influence the organization of spontaneous thought, particularly in individuals with greater cardiac interoceptive accuracy. Bodily signals may therefore act as an automatic constraint on the ongoing stream of thought, biasing which thought contents and transitions become more likely over time.

The gastrics intrinsic slow-wave rhythm couples to ongoing cortical activity in humans, but the functional significance of this gastric-brain coupling remains poorly understood. Using simultaneous electroencephalography and electrogastrography, we examined how gastric-brain coupling changes during a mental task and subsequent recovery and whether these dynamics relate to autonomic responses in healthy adults (HA) and individuals with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), a disorder of gut-brain interactions. In HA, gastric-brain coupling decreased during mental task and gradually returned to baseline during recovery, primarily for cortical alpha rhythms. Greater reductions in gastric-brain coupling were associated with stronger sympathetic arousal, indicating that gastric-brain coupling is associated with physiological responses to cognitive demand. In IBS, gastric-brain coupling dynamics were preserved. However, unlike HA, sympathetic arousal was not associated with gastric-brain coupling reductions, suggesting an alteration in the functional relationship between gastric-brain coupling and autonomic regulation despite preserved coupling dynamics. Further, in HA, greater reductions in gastric-brain coupling were associated with higher anxiety and neuroticism and lower interoceptive awareness. In contrast, these relationships were reversed in IBS, with greater gastric-brain coupling dynamics observed in individuals with higher anxiety and neuroticism and lower interoceptive awareness. Together, gastric-brain coupling emerges as a dynamic physiological process associated with autonomic responses to cognitive demand. In IBS, these dynamics are preserved but their physiological and psychological associations are altered, indicating a dissociation between gastric-brain coupling and its functional correlates. Significance StatementThe functional role of gastric-brain coupling remains largely unknown. We show that coupling between the gastrics intrinsic slow-wave rhythm and cortical activity is dynamically reduced during mental engagement and recovers afterward, primarily through alpha rhythms. In healthy adults, these changes follow sympathetic arousal, linking gastric-brain coupling to autonomic responses to cognitive demands. In irritable bowel syndrome, coupling dynamics remain intact but lose their relationship with autonomic responses and show altered associations with anxiety, neuroticism, and interoceptive awareness. These findings suggest that gastric-brain coupling contributes to the physiological organization of brain-body states and that irritable bowel syndrome may involve altered functional interpretation of visceral signals despite preserved gastric-brain coupling dynamics.

Digital behaviour change interventions have emerged as a promising approach for improving health, well-being, and performance, yet relatively few studies have evaluated their effects using objective biological and neurophysiological measures. The present study examined the effectiveness of Autonomic, a neuroscience-informed digital coaching platform designed to improve student well-being through personalized behavioural interventions targeting sleep, stress, mood, energy, and focus. Thirty university students engaged with the platform for ten weeks and completed behavioural assessments, biomarker collection, and electroencephalographic (EEG) testing at baseline, five weeks, and ten weeks. Behavioural outcomes included self-reported ratings of focus, energy, sleep, mood, and stress. Biological measures included salivary cortisol and tear fluid dopamine concentrations. EEG assessments included resting-state recordings, frontal theta activity during a working memory task, and N200/P300 event-related potentials during a visual oddball task. Significant improvements were observed in self-reported focus, energy, and sleep quality across the intervention. Electrophysiological measures demonstrated reduced frontal theta power during working memory and shorter P300 latencies during attentional processing, consistent with more efficient cognitive processing following the intervention. Although cortisol, dopamine, and resting-state EEG measures did not reach statistical significance, all exhibited changes in the predicted direction. Collectively, these findings provide converging behavioural, biological, and neurophysiological evidence supporting the effectiveness of Autonomic. More broadly, the study demonstrates the value of combining objective biomarkers and EEG with traditional behavioural assessments when evaluating digital behaviour change interventions and highlights the potential of neuroscience-informed coaching platforms to improve health, well-being, and cognitive functioning in university students.

Interoception and homeostatic/allostatic control are not only fundamental for survival but play a key role for maintaining somatic and mental health. Furthermore, metacognitive evaluations of these processes, such as perceived failure of allostatic regulation, have been proposed to underlie the experience of chronic symptoms, such as chronic fatigue. A central question in this regard is what mechanisms the brain uses to evaluate control over bodily states. A prominent computational proposal posits that this is achieved by monitoring of interoceptive prediction errors (PEs). However, to date, this proposal has not been tested experimentally. Here, we tested this hypothesis by applying computational process models of perceived control to data from a novel behavioural paradigm, the Respiratory Metacognition of Control Task (RMCT). The RMCT manipulates control over breathing by changing inspiratory resistive loads as a function of control achieved in a gamified prediction task. We developed and compared trial-by-trial generative models of perceived explicit control in the RMCT, using data from 50 volunteers in a pre-registered analysis. Bayesian model selection suggested that perceived control over breathing is best explained as a function of both trial-wise interoceptive outcomes (breathing with or without an inspiratory resistive load) and trial-wise PEs about respiratory resistance. These results support a longstanding computational proposal of how the brain detects failures of bodily regulation and provide a mechanistic model for understanding inter-individual differences in perceived control over bodily states.

Emotions are dynamic experiences that unfold over time, yet most affective neuroscience studies have relied on static stimuli and laboratory-based EEG systems. This study examined whether emotional valence and arousal can be reliably decoded using a consumer-grade wearable EEG device in naturalistic contexts. Forty-three participants viewed video clips designed to elicit four core affect categories including high-arousal positive, low-arousal positive, high-arousal negative, and low-arousal negative, while EEG signals were continuously recorded. Multivariate analyses, including classification, multidimensional scaling (MDS), and intersubject correlation (ISC), were employed to assess affective representation and neural synchrony. Behavioral data demonstrated robust classification of both valence and arousal, whereas EEG data yielded consistent above-chance classification of valence but less stable decoding of arousal, particularly in within-participant analyses. MDS revealed that both behavioral and EEG responses were primarily organized along the valence dimension, with weaker separation along arousal. ISC analyses further indicated frequency- and region-specific neural synchrony, with stronger alignment in left and temporal electrodes, though overall ISC values were modest, likely reflecting the brief duration of stimuli. Taken together, these findings suggest that valence is more stably represented in both subjective and neural domains, whereas arousal may require time-resolved or longer-duration approaches for reliable decoding. This work demonstrates the feasibility and limitations of employing wearable EEG for theory-driven affective neuroscience, underscoring its potential for scalable and ecologically valid emotion research beyond laboratory settings.

Creative ideation involves a dynamic exchange between exploring new idea categories and exploiting familiar ones, reflecting optimal foraging principles. Although interoceptive signals, particularly cardiac activity, are associated with differences in attention and cognitive control, their role in explore-exploit dynamics during creative idea generation remains unknown. Recording both electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocardiography (ECG) data, we used convolution general linear models to examine cardiac-brain interactions underlying semantic exploration and exploitation during creative idea generation, in both spontaneous (self-selected) and directed (externally cued) conditions. Cardiac deceleration predicted ideation time: this relationship scaled nonlinearly during exploration (category switching), but linearly during exploitation (category persistence), in both conditions. Cardiac deceleration did not predict semantic distance (between response and cue word) or response accuracy during the directed condition, suggesting that heart rate slowing reflects cognitive effort allocation rather than ideational content. Cardiac phase systematically biased explore-exploit dynamics: spontaneous switching and accurate directed-switching were preferentially associated with diastolic phases and parieto-occipital alpha (8-12 Hz) desynchronization, whereas category persistence was associated with systolic phase timing and frontal theta (4-6 Hz) synchronization. The former activity was coupled to higher CD, as expected. However, the latter time-frequency activity was linked to responses timed to systole. These findings suggest that creative ideation unfolds through embodied cardiac-cortical coordination, whereby diastolic states are associated with flexible semantic exploration and alpha-related attentional dynamics, whereas systolic states are associated with exploitative persistence and theta-related control processes. This suggests interoceptive rhythms as temporal scaffolding that structures when and how ideas emerge, fundamentally expanding creativity neuroscience beyond purely cortical models.

Ostracism (i.e., social exclusion) threatens social security and individuals who are hypersensitive to it may face long-term negative mental health consequences. Clarifying how self-reported distress and neural responses to ostracism unfold moment-by-moment and across varying levels of individual traits may help better understand what contributes to hypersensitivity. To this objective, the current study employed a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) adapted Cyberball task and single-trial analytic techniques in a sample of 53 college students (aged 18-22 years). Results confirmed that Cyberball induced ostracism increased self-reported distress and neural activity in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC), a region associated with emotion regulation. Self-reported distress varied with differences in social anxiety and need for belonging. Moreover, vlPFC activity sensitized across exclusion-specific trials and this neural sensitization was differentially modulated by social anxiety, need for belonging, and personality growth mindset. The current study highlights the value of single-trial approaches for capturing the nuanced temporal dynamics of ostracism responses. Additionally, it underscores the importance of examining how individual differences shape immediate responses to ostracism to better understand their association with downstream, longer-term consequences.

Cardiovascular regulation depends on bidirectional communication between autonomic cardiac control and cardiac afferent signals ascending to the central nervous system, forming a heart-brain loop. Cardio-auditory omission paradigms provide a non-invasive way to probe this loop in humans by withholding scheduled tones within heartbeat-contingent auditory sequences and measuring the resulting autonomic cardiac and heartbeat-related cortical responses. Previous studies have shown omission-evoked cardiac deceleration and neural responses mainly in specific contexts such as passive listening or synchrony-judgement tasks. The present study examined whether these responses also occur under the more general condition of active responses to external stimuli. We tested 40 adults in an auditory detection task in which tones were presented either 200 ms after the ECG R-peak (synch) or at pseudo-random intervals matched to each participants resting heart rate (asynch). A five-minute no-stimulation resting recording was used to generate the asynch sequence and served as the resting comparison condition. In both auditory conditions, 10% of scheduled tones were omitted, yielding synch and asynch omissions. Heartbeat-synchronous omissions induced sustained RR-interval prolongation that exceeded responses to asynch omissions, sound-present conditions, and rest. HEP amplitude was selectively enhanced in the synch-omission condition relative to all other conditions. Reaction times to the first post-omission tone were slightly delayed, whereas overall performance remained comparable across conditions. These findings show that heartbeat-synchronous auditory omissions produce a distinct autonomic-cortical response profile under active response demands, indicating that heart-brain loop dynamics continue to shape physiological responses during ongoing behaviour.

Laboratory stress tasks are widely used to assess individual differences in acute stress reactivity, yet it remains unclear how these responses correspond to stress experienced in everyday life. Here, we combined the Montreal imaging stress task (MIST) with ecological momentary assessment (EMA) over three months to assess acute and everyday stress in 67 healthy women. Greater within-person variability in everyday stress, but not average stress levels, were associated with stronger overall stress-related brain responses (b = 0.73, p = .039), with a whole-brain association particularly evident in the bilateral caudate (rROI = .32, pcluster.FWE < .001). Greater everyday stress variability was also associated with stronger stress-related functional connectivity between the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and parietal and posterior medial regions (pcluster.FWE < .001). We conclude that acute neural stress responses relate more closely to fluctuations in perceived stress than to how stressed an individual feels on average. This suggests that laboratory stress tasks capture acute stress responsivity that is distinct from average stress exposure, highlighting the importance of considering what these tasks measure when interpreting individual differences in acute stress responses.

Gut-brain communication has emerged as a rapidly expanding field of research, with recent electrophysiological studies revealing rhythmic gut-brain coupling between gastric activity and brain oscillations in humans. Gut motility is a key determinant of gastrointestinal function, but it remains unclear whether individual differences in gut motility reflected by weekly bowel movements (e.g., defecation frequency) are associated with differences in gut-brain coupling. Here, we address this question by examining women with self-reported daily bowel movements (N = 38) and women with less frequent bowel movements (N = 38). We recorded simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and electrogastrography (EGG) at fasting state, performed cognitive assessments, and analysed faecal short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) as markers of colonic fermentation. In a subset of participants, EEG-EGG coupling was assessed twice over an interval of at least eight weeks to assess test-retest reliability. In this group, EEG-EGG coupling showed moderate test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) = 0.50). When comparing the two groups of women, the phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) analysis between EEG and EGG signals revealed a significantly stronger gut-brain coupling in women with daily bowel movements compared to women with less frequent bowel movements (p = 0.03). We additionally found that women with daily bowel movements made less errors in the cognitive tasks and had higher levels of faecal SCFAs. A path analysis suggested that bowel movements significantly affect gut-brain phase-amplitude coupling through faecal SCFAs. However, neither faecal SCFAs nor phase-amplitude coupling significantly predicted cognitive performance, suggesting the existence of alternative pathways for the association between bowel movements and cognitive performance. Together, our findings suggest that the strength of gut-brain coupling is associated with bowel movements and cognitive performance, making EEG-EGG coupling a promising marker of human gut-brain interactions.

Anxiety-related traits (ARTs) have been linked to altered fear learning, but previous studies have typically examined different experimental phases and response systems, limiting the comparability of findings and the accumulation of consistent evidence. Here, we comprehensively examined associations between ARTs and fear conditioning across acquisition, extinction and renewal and across subjective, physiological and neural response systems in a well-powered sample (N = 267) using a two-day differential conditioning paradigm. ARTs were operationalized as a composite of trait anxiety, neuroticism, and intolerance of uncertainty and conditioned responding was assessed using skin conductance responses, fear-potentiated startle, US expectancy ratings, fear ratings, and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Higher ARTs were consistently associated with elevated subjective fear and US expectancy to both threat and safety cues during extinction and renewal, without corresponding elevations in physiological responding. At the same time, ARTs were not associated with threat-safety discrimination in subjective or physiological measures across phases, while neural associations were limited to reduced dorsal anterior cingulate cortex discrimination during early renewal. These findings suggest that ARTs are characterized by a CS unspecific cognitive bias toward heightened threat expectancy and evaluation rather than altered associative fear learning, highlighting the importance of distinguishing conditioned discrimination from general levels of responding across response systems.

Aversion to inequity is innate in humans and constitutes a major contributor to social tension. Such aversion can be triggered either when one receives more (advantageous inequity-AI) or less (disadvantageous inequity-DI) than others. However, it remains unclear whether oxytocin can modulate how humans respond to inequity. The present pre-registered study combined behavioral measures, computational modelling, and fMRI in a novel monetary allocation evaluation paradigm to examine oxytocins modulation of behavioral and neural responses to inequity. Results showed that oxytocin increased perceived fairness and AI allocation choices via enhancing AI preference independent of gain vs. loss contexts, which was further confirmed by model-based results of oxytocin decreasing AI aversion. In parallel at the neural level, oxytocin increased fairness rating-related activity in regions within fairness-related norm enforcement systems involved in norm violation detection, salience processing, and cognitive control. Multivariate-based representational similarity analyses provided further evidence that oxytocin induced distinct representational patterns of inequity in these core regions. These results suggest that oxytocin promoted AI preference possibly by strengthening regulatory control to support the pursuit of economic self-interest, while simultaneously enhancing the salience of AI allocations. Our study provides new insights into behavioral and neural mechanisms through which oxytocin modulates fairness-related behavior.

ObjectiveCurrent theoretical frameworks operationalize listening effort as a monolithic, unified sympathetic response, driving the search for a single universal clinical biomarker (predominantly task-evoked pupillometry). This study stress-tests the "unified arousal" hypothesis by evaluating the continuous cross-modal overlap of autonomic and cortical responses during a speech-in-noise paradigm. DesignContinuous, simultaneous physiological tracking-including Pupillometry (Locus Coeruleus), Galvanic Skin Response (GSR), Cardiac Inter-beat Interval (IBI), Respiration Rate, and Frontal Alpha EEG-was conducted on N=28 normal-hearing adults. Participants completed a continuous speech-in-noise task (OLSA) across varying Signal-to-Noise Ratios (+12 dB to -16 dB). A continuous Spearmans rank correlation matrix was utilized to assess physiological decoupling, and Linear Mixed-Effects (LME) models isolated single-trial effort dynamics. ResultsThe data revealed a lack of meaningful cross-modal overlap. Continuous correlation matrices demonstrated negligible relationships across the four autonomic channels (all p>0.05). Trial-level cross-correlations confirmed extremely weak functional coupling across the autonomic nervous system (mean effect sizes strictly bounded between {rho}=-0.042 and {rho}=0.065). These negligible effect sizes fail to support the "unified sympathetic storm" hypothesis, providing strong evidence for heavy physiological decoupling, where autonomic channels fail to synchronize during acute stress. Furthermore, subjective retrospective effort was highly collinear with objective task difficulty (r=0.848), offering limited independent tracking of internal state. ConclusionsListening effort is not a unified whole-body state; it is an idiosyncratic, heavily decoupled biological routing process. The reliance on single-channel tracking is structurally flawed, as it is blind to autonomic diversity. Future models of cognitive exertion must decouple generalized capacity allocation from idiosyncratic autonomic routing, and experimental paradigms must separate genuine effortful limits from active task withdrawal.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is widely used to map brain systems that process affective stimuli and predict concurrent affective experiences in the scanner. However, the extent to which affect-related fMRI activity in the scanner predicts affective experiences in daily life remains unclear. This study examined whether a multivariate brain pattern previously validated to predict negative affect to emotional images during fMRI testing (the Picture-Induced Negative Emotion Signature; PINES) associates with daily negative affect measured over 7-10 days via daily diaries and ecological momentary assessment. Among 287 midlife adults, those exhibiting greater PINES pattern expression showed greater daily (end-of-day) and hourly negative affect. These findings were not explained by demographic factors and trait negative affect. A cross-validated whole-brain pattern of negative affect generalizes beyond the fMRI testing context to predict negative affect severity in daily life.